Case note: injunction against unlicensed finfluencer

In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Scholz (No 3) [2023] FCA 337 the Federal Court of Australia ordered that, following an earlier decision that Tyson Scholz had carried on a financial services business between at least early 2020 and November 2021 without an Australian Financial Services Licence, that he be restrained from:

(a) hosting online groups for which a membership fee is charged, and in which messages are exchanged by members about share trades (either in a group chat or through direct messages from the defendant), without an Australian Financial Services Licence;
(b) carrying on a financial services business in Australia in contravention of section 911A of the Act.

Background.

Scholz was also ordered to pay ASIC’s costs.

If you found this article helpful, then subscribe to our news emails to keep up to date and look at our video courses for in-depth training. Use the search box at the top right of this page or the categories list on the right hand side of this page to check for other articles on the same or related matters.

David Jacobson

Author: David Jacobson
Principal, Bright Corporate Law
Email:
About David Jacobson
The information contained in this article is not legal advice. It is not to be relied upon as a full statement of the law. You should seek professional advice for your specific needs and circumstances before acting or relying on any of the content.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
 

Your Compliance Support Plan

We understand you need a cost-effective way to keep up to date with regulatory changes. Talk to us about our fixed price plans.